Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Pablo Paz vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paz vs Dancu analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Paz vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paz 3 - 2 Dancu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paz has won 49.49% of points on their second serve, while Dancu has won 48.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paz, in recent form, has won 52.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dancu has won 49.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.4% and 36.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paz has saved 51.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancu has saved 58.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paz has won 54.84% of matches played (W/L 34/ 28), with Dancu winning 59.74% (W/L 46/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 440/ 301), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Dancu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 174/ 114), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Dancu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.27% of matches (W/L 44/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Paz winning 3 times and Dancu being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Paz winning 6 and Dancu winning 4. The last match between Paz and Dancu was at the M15 Arad, 29-09-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Vlad Andrei Dancu getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paz and Dancu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paz winning 0 times and Dancu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paz winning 0, and Dancu 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paz has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.89 while Dancu has played against players with an average rank of 155.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paz has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancu has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paz has converted 40.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancu has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
597
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total2
0
Hard0
3
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
527
Rank
503
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
58% (449-319)
Career Total W/L
59% (184-129)
40% (8-12)
YTD W/L
52% (15-14)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Juan Pablo Paz vs Vlad Andrei Dancu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Paz VS Dancu
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 4 |
| Games Won | 49 | 46 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (192/289) | 47% (133/283) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (131/192) | 73% (97/133) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (52/97) | 52% (78/150) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (13/27) | 48% (10/21) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (108/283) | 37% (106/289) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
36%
(
17 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
17 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 52% (15/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (20/24) | 48% (37/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (196/208) | 50% (380/378) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (8/12) | 52% (15/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 88 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:44 | 2:8:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.55 | 136.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (807/1249) | 57% (1382/2427) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (517/807) | 65% (902/1382) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (219/442) | 49% (508/1045) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (55/132) | 50% (106/212) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (519/1298) | 42% (945/2277) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (5/6) | 52% (15/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 63% (12/19) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 41% (17/7) |
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Christian Fellin
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlad Andrei Dancu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(0) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Daniel Uta
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
3
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
52%
(
59 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Vuk Radjenovic
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
81)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Peter Hampe
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-7(4) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Drazen Petrovic
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
4-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Paz Vs Dancu Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Paz are available here and Dancu photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
